PDP: Poor handling of the economy caused recession, not Jonathan
Our attention has been drawn to the recent inconsiderate statement attributed to the governor of Jigawa State Abubakar Badaru and other comments made by people who think like him, to the effect that the last People’s Democratic Party (PDP) Administration was responsible for the current recession.
It is really disappointing that a notable personality as highly placed as a state governor could be drawn into making idle and pedestrian claims, without the benefit of facts. It is either he does not realize the obligation of speaking responsibly in that position, or he is grossly ill-informed, in which case we could only try to put the facts before him, hoping he would recognise them.
In the first place, this blame is misplaced because elementary understanding of economics teaches one that the main cause of recession is galloping inflation and poor handling of the economy, given that the higher the rate of inflation, the more impoverished people become, industrial performance and overall production decline, resulting in massive job losses.
Perhaps we should quote those who should know and tell Governor Badaru that wrong economic policies of the Government of the All Progressive Congress (APC) caused the current stagnation and recession in the country.
Larry Ettah, President, of the Nigerian Employers Consultative Association (NECA) did not mince words when he said few days ago that “it is quite evident that the lack of clarity about the economic agenda of the current government contributed to the current economic stagnation and recession.”
He said further: “In recent times at our AGMs, we have variously described our operating environment as challenging, unpredictable, unstable and energy sapping. These words are, of course, true and descriptive of what our members have experienced in keeping their businesses afloat.”
However, beyond that, we make bold to tell Governor Badaru that Jonathan and the People’s Democratic Party Government saw this coming since 2011, and wanted to deregulate the sale of hydrocarbons in 2012, but Badaru and his co-travellers who are now in the All Progressives Congress, frustrated the effort.
The former Administration also wanted to encourage more savings in the excess crude account (ECA) and set up the Sovereign wealth Fund (SWF) but the Badarus of this world, who play politics with serious national issues, especially those who were state governors at the time, took the Federal Government to court and did everything to frustrate the effort. Thank God some of them are among the best brains in the APC federal government of today.
Governor Badaru should know that you can’t plant grapes and harvest mangoes. It is no secret that the policies and statements made by key government actors have not been business friendly and Nigerian and foreign business men took their hard currencies out of the country. When professionals were advising the government to woo investors, characters like Badaru were busy de-marketing Nigeria all over the world.
They should be reminded that great leaders take over countries either in recession or war and still succeed in turning them around; quite unlike the prevailing situation where a ruling party plunged a performing economy into an avoidable recession, only to turn round and begin to whine helplessly like a baby.
Franklin D. Roosevelt, the 32nd President of the United States who was in office at the time of unprecedented economic depression and total war, upon assuming office immediately introduced an ambitious programme for relief, recovery and reform called the Great Deal, which began to yield considerable dividends in weeks, and Americans even today, have not stopped singing his praise.
Badaru and those who still think like him should tell Nigerians the character of the economic team in place, which has been managing the nation’s economy since 29th May 2015. This ‘economic management policy’ of unhealthy propaganda and blaming the previous administration ceaselessly, will not take us anywhere.
It is on record that one APC governor after his inauguration for his second tenure publicly announced that he inherited an empty treasury.
He was quickly reminded that he couldn’t have inherited an empty treasury from himself. This, unfortunately, is the face of the comedy and farce that now characterise governors and governance in this country.
Will Badaru and his party men continue to blame Jonathan and the PDP till 2019 and then use Jonathan’s name for the 2019 campaign, instead of showcasing their scorecard? The good thing is that Nigerians, who were being hoodwinked at first, are now seeing through the deception of this unending blame game.
Any dispassionate assessment of economic performance under Jonathan would obviously frown at Governor Badaru’s type of impulsive conclusion, without recourse to the strong macroeconomic fundamentals recorded under Jonathan, which laid the foundation for meaningful growth.
In particular, despite intervening global downturn, the overall real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth rate stood at an average of 6%, a growth that was largely driven by the non-oil sector, in line with the success of the diversification effort of the Administration. There is no doubt that there was obvious improvement in inflation pressure which stood at a single digit and provided the stability and guarantees needed for the economy to remain stable.
It actually borders on ignorance to claim that no cost cutting measures were introduced when the Jonathan administration, in one sector, was able to reduce its food import bill from well over N1t to N684.7 billion as at December 2013 and subsequently cut it further down with unprecedented improvements in local food production.
Where was the Governor when Jonathan’s administration embarked on comprehensive reforms in different sectors towards infrastructural renewal, promotion of sustainable development and the growth of the nation’s economy to become the largest in Africa with more than $510billion in GDP size and about US$ 2500 per capita income?
Did he ever wonder why despite the “signals towards end of 2013 to 2014”, as rightly identified by the governor to be the beginning of hard times, the economy remained stable with single digit inflation during those periods?
Let Gov. Badaru be reminded that the demand for scarce foreign exchange needed for importation remained limited because the milestones recorded in the local production of rice and other staple food ensured robust local supply and remarkable progression.
We would be disappointed if the governor was oblivious of what was happening around him in the area of agricultural revolution, especially as farmers from his part of the country openly expressed their support and celebrated their gains from these initiatives.
Again, when he said that “the past leaders did nothing to stop” a looming recession, we have no choice but rise to put the facts right. Less we forget, when the Senate approved $52 benchmark for the administration’s last budget at a time oil was selling for about $60 and crashing further, the government did not just sit down and watch events unfold. Under the leadership of the finance ministry, the administration developed a scenario-based fiscal template, with definite responses designed to track and tackle varying challenges in the volatility regime.
We should also remind Badaru that the recent visit of the Facebook founder, Mark Zukerberg to the Co-Creation Hub (CcHub) in Yaba, Lagos, wouldn’t have happened if Jonathan did not have the vision to set up the two ICT incubation centers in Lagos and calabar. The former President built the centres in support of youth entrepreneurship, just as he did with other successful youth-focused programmes like the Youth Enterprise with Innovation (YOUWIN) and the Nagropreneur initiative that turned agriculture into an attractive industry for youths.
Need we remind the Governor that all these and other sectoral reforms were possible because of the performance contract model Jonathan developed for his ministers, where key performance indicators (KPI) were jointly agreed and signed, against which each minister’s measurable effectiveness was benchmarked?
Post a Comment