PDP: Poor handling of the economy caused recession, not Jonathan
Our
attention has been drawn to the recent inconsiderate statement
attributed to the governor of Jigawa State Abubakar Badaru and other
comments made by people who think like him, to the effect that the last
People’s Democratic Party (PDP) Administration was responsible for the
current recession.
It
is really disappointing that a notable personality as highly placed as a
state governor could be drawn into making idle and pedestrian claims,
without the benefit of facts. It is either he does not realize the
obligation of speaking responsibly in that position, or he is grossly
ill-informed, in which case we could only try to put the facts before
him, hoping he would recognise them.
In
the first place, this blame is misplaced because elementary
understanding of economics teaches one that the main cause of recession
is galloping inflation and poor handling of the economy, given that the
higher the rate of inflation, the more impoverished people become,
industrial performance and overall production decline, resulting in
massive job losses.
Perhaps
we should quote those who should know and tell Governor Badaru that
wrong economic policies of the Government of the All Progressive
Congress (APC) caused the current stagnation and recession in the
country.
Larry
Ettah, President, of the Nigerian Employers Consultative Association
(NECA) did not mince words when he said few days ago that “it is quite
evident that the lack of clarity about the economic agenda of the
current government contributed to the current economic stagnation and
recession.”
He
said further: “In recent times at our AGMs, we have variously described
our operating environment as challenging, unpredictable, unstable and
energy sapping. These words are, of course, true and descriptive of
what our members have experienced in keeping their businesses afloat.”
However,
beyond that, we make bold to tell Governor Badaru that Jonathan and
the People’s Democratic Party Government saw this coming since 2011,
and wanted to deregulate the sale of hydrocarbons in 2012, but Badaru
and his co-travellers who are now in the All Progressives Congress,
frustrated the effort.
The
former Administration also wanted to encourage more savings in the
excess crude account (ECA) and set up the Sovereign wealth Fund (SWF)
but the Badarus of this world, who play politics with serious national
issues, especially those who were state governors at the time, took the
Federal Government to court and did everything to frustrate the effort.
Thank God some of them are among the best brains in the APC federal
government of today.
Governor
Badaru should know that you can’t plant grapes and harvest mangoes. It
is no secret that the policies and statements made by key government
actors have not been business friendly and Nigerian and foreign
business men took their hard currencies out of the country. When
professionals were advising the government to woo investors, characters
like Badaru were busy de-marketing Nigeria all over the world.
They
should be reminded that great leaders take over countries either in
recession or war and still succeed in turning them around; quite unlike
the prevailing situation where a ruling party plunged a performing
economy into an avoidable recession, only to turn round and begin to
whine helplessly like a baby.
Franklin
D. Roosevelt, the 32nd President of the United States who was in
office at the time of unprecedented economic depression and total war,
upon assuming office immediately introduced an ambitious programme for
relief, recovery and reform called the Great Deal, which began to yield
considerable dividends in weeks, and Americans even today, have not
stopped singing his praise.
Badaru
and those who still think like him should tell Nigerians the character
of the economic team in place, which has been managing the nation’s
economy since 29th May 2015. This ‘economic management policy’ of
unhealthy propaganda and blaming the previous administration
ceaselessly, will not take us anywhere.
It
is on record that one APC governor after his inauguration for his
second tenure publicly announced that he inherited an empty treasury.
He
was quickly reminded that he couldn’t have inherited an empty treasury
from himself. This, unfortunately, is the face of the comedy and farce
that now characterise governors and governance in this country.
Will
Badaru and his party men continue to blame Jonathan and the PDP till
2019 and then use Jonathan’s name for the 2019 campaign, instead of
showcasing their scorecard? The good thing is that Nigerians, who were
being hoodwinked at first, are now seeing through the deception of this
unending blame game.
Any
dispassionate assessment of economic performance under Jonathan would
obviously frown at Governor Badaru’s type of impulsive conclusion,
without recourse to the strong macroeconomic fundamentals recorded under
Jonathan, which laid the foundation for meaningful growth.
In
particular, despite intervening global downturn, the overall real
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth rate stood at an average of 6%, a
growth that was largely driven by the non-oil sector, in line with the
success of the diversification effort of the Administration. There is
no doubt that there was obvious improvement in inflation pressure which
stood at a single digit and provided the stability and guarantees
needed for the economy to remain stable.
It
actually borders on ignorance to claim that no cost cutting measures
were introduced when the Jonathan administration, in one sector, was
able to reduce its food import bill from well over N1t to N684.7 billion
as at December 2013 and subsequently cut it further down with
unprecedented improvements in local food production.
Where
was the Governor when Jonathan’s administration embarked on
comprehensive reforms in different sectors towards infrastructural
renewal, promotion of sustainable development and the growth of the
nation’s economy to become the largest in Africa with more than
$510billion in GDP size and about US$ 2500 per capita income?
Did
he ever wonder why despite the “signals towards end of 2013 to 2014”,
as rightly identified by the governor to be the beginning of hard
times, the economy remained stable with single digit inflation during
those periods?
Let
Gov. Badaru be reminded that the demand for scarce foreign exchange
needed for importation remained limited because the milestones
recorded in the local production of rice and other staple food ensured
robust local supply and remarkable progression.
We
would be disappointed if the governor was oblivious of what was
happening around him in the area of agricultural revolution, especially
as farmers from his part of the country openly expressed their support
and celebrated their gains from these initiatives.
Again,
when he said that “the past leaders did nothing to stop” a looming
recession, we have no choice but rise to put the facts right. Less we
forget, when the Senate approved $52 benchmark for the administration’s
last budget at a time oil was selling for about $60 and crashing
further, the government did not just sit down and watch events unfold.
Under the leadership of the finance ministry, the administration
developed a scenario-based fiscal template, with definite responses
designed to track and tackle varying challenges in the volatility
regime.
We
should also remind Badaru that the recent visit of the Facebook
founder, Mark Zukerberg to the Co-Creation Hub (CcHub) in Yaba, Lagos,
wouldn’t have happened if Jonathan did not have the vision to set up
the two ICT incubation centers in Lagos and calabar. The former
President built the centres in support of youth entrepreneurship, just
as he did with other successful youth-focused programmes like the Youth
Enterprise with Innovation (YOUWIN) and the Nagropreneur initiative
that turned agriculture into an attractive industry for youths.
Need
we remind the Governor that all these and other sectoral reforms were
possible because of the performance contract model Jonathan developed
for his ministers, where key performance indicators (KPI) were jointly
agreed and signed, against which each minister’s measurable
effectiveness was benchmarked?
Post a Comment