Delay in passage of the Building Code largely responsible for building collapses -Bldr. Yakubu
Building
collapses, like the one that recently occurred in Gwarinpa in the
Federal Capital Territory (FCT) is no more news. Several of such
occurrences had led to loss of lives and property. Yet, after each
tragedy, comes another and yet, another, with no end seemingly in sight.
Trying to resolve these knotty issues was the former chairman of FCT
Chapter of the Nigerian Institute of Buildings (NIIOB), Bldr, Musa
Yakubu who, while speaking with ABBANOBI-EKU ONYEKA, blamed the
stakeholders for the tragedy. His reports:
Before
going into the causes of this menace, Yakubu called for legislation
that would make it mandatory for building designers and construction
professionals to possess either the Higher National Diploma (HND) or a
Bachelor of Science (B.Sc) from a recognized institution. He also
stated that while in training, the intending licenced builder, should
be made to undergo a three-year mandatory practical and professional
training under the supervision of a recognised and experienced
certified builder in preparation for professional examinations, before
being licenced as a builder.
“After
submitting practical log book issued to him from the institution, the
person should be invited by a panel of professionals and if proven to
be competent, such a person should be given an ordinary membership
certificate, after which the institute recommends him or her to the
Council Of Registered Builders Of Nigeria (CORBON) for issuance of a
higher certificate and renewal of such certificate yearly,” he stressed.
He
also shed light on the quality of professionals expected to be
involved in a building project and their functions which if followed
strictly, according to him, building collapses will be a thing of the
past. According to him, “about seven professionals should be involved
in constructing any building, namely, Land Surveyor, whose duty it is
to determine the type of the soil that exist in a place; Town Planner,
that ensures that you build in line with the planning regulations of
the government; Estate Surveyor; the Architect, who designs the
building; the Structural, Mechanical and Electrical Engineers who will
do all the structural, mechanical and electrical elements; the Quantity
Surveyor, who comes up with the cost component of the building; and
the Builder, who takes up the administration of the project by ensuring
that the project is built in line with the design and quality standard”.
He
also explained that projects are divided into infrastructural and
building projects. In infrastructural, you have roads, culverts,
bridges, dams and similar ones in which civil engineers specialise on,
while the builders specialise on the building aspect. He informed that
as the project is on-going, all the professionals should be coming
regularly to site to ensure that the project construction is in tandem
with mapped-out specifications.
Although
he exonerated builders from the series of building collapses, he did
not mince words to say that any of the aforementioned professionals
could be held responsibile and accountable depending on their level of
proven infraction. He said: “It is not always the fault of the builder
in cases of building collapses. Let me explain. If there was error in
the structural design given to the Builder by the Structural Engineer
and he followed the structural design given to him strictly, he
shouldn’t be blamed if the building collapses, because what he used was
the technical handed over to him for execution. There could be
instances, for example, where items for the building recommended by the
Architect may even not even conform to the requirements of the building
of that nature and such could cause a building collapse.
“Again,
a mistake by the Architect and the Quantity Surveyor while playing
their own part, could also bring about building collapses. For instance,
an Architect designs a specification and recommends what would be used
and due to the cost implications of purchasing exactly the specified
item recommended by the Architect, the Quantity Surveyor insists that
the owner of the property can’t afford the cost of those items and
changes the recommended items to an alternative, such changes can also
lead to a building collapse. When a building collapses, the blame is
not just to be laid at the door steps of only one person. The onus is on
you to find out what caused it.
“Another
example, if the Structural Engineer makes a mistake in his designs by
specifying iron rod y-15mm as loading for a high rise, when the loading
is supposed to be y-25mm and the person in-charge of procurement buys
what he sees, the Builder should not be blamed should collapse occur.
This is because he used the information before him. If a Land Surveyor
recommends that a particular land is strong enough to carry a 25-storey
building and you go ahead and erect the building and after two years the
building collapses due to the softness of the land, the builder should
not be blamed. Most of the problems start from the foundation and that
is why it is important to do thorough soil tests to determine if the
strength of the soil can carry the bearings of the building”.
Musa
Yakubu did not exonerate building owners. According to him, some of the
building owners would make a foundation for a storey building, but due
to the urge to make more money, they would go and seek the services of a
quack and add more storeys on top of the existing one and when such
building collapses, you should not blame the professionals. “Some even
would bring a relation or friend who is a quack and engage him in a
building project and some of such quacks in order to minimise cost for
the owner, would use under-gaged materials which could result in
building collapses,” he explained.
On
its part, he faulted government, monitoring system, stressing that
most of the collapsed buildings had “stop work” order marked on them by
government agency, but would turn a blind eye when money exchanges
hands. He wondered why the same agency would keep adamant over such an
infraction insisting that such should not be treated lightly.
Based
on his findings, no less than 25 buildings have collapsed within and
outside the FCT in the past couple of years, but that of all these, it
was only that of the Synagogue Church of all Nations in that was taken
to the court, stressing that taking such cases to court in order to
ascertain its causes and come out with punishment would help eliminate
further collapses.
On
what NIIOB was doing to curtail such incidences, he informed that
sanctions had been applied to erring members. He added that additional
effort led to the Building Code still gathering dust at the National
Assembly since it was submitted 10 years ago. The Code according to
him contains all the rules that would address the problems in the
building industry and urged the lawmakers to pass the bill without
further delay.





Post a Comment