The other side of Muhammad Ali (3)
This is the third week, Sohia’s Diaz has reached for the true essence
of Muhammad Ali; beyond the empty razzmatazz. Ali, the standard of
manliness was, at death, packaged as a show but he had a core that was
as hard as a flint. After Ali’s lawyers gave a Federal Court a list of
ninety convicted murderers, rapists, sodomites, armed thieves, and
other miscreants who had been allowed to fight in New York, it ruled
that the state’s denial of a ring license to Ali was “arbitrary and
unreasonable.”
That was how Ali got to return to the ring in USA; against Oscar
Bonavena – in New York. And thus began Act Two of the Ali drama. In Act
One, he was a young and rhythmic dancer, swift as lightening – both with
his fists and legs, and would float away from opponents’ blows. But
with the Ali-Frazier fight of March 8, 1971, still in New York, Act Two
incepted.
A word please about his 1971 visit to Nigeria; once the Nigerian
Airways aircraft had steadied after takeoff, the pilot announced that
The Greatest was among the passengers, and he invited Ali to the
cockpit. Ali poked his head into the cockpit and ran out shouting that
every passenger should please come and see “This amazing sight; its
unbelievable that the Pilot and the co-Pilot are Blacks. I have never
seen such a thing in the US. They never told us that black Pilots and
Black Engineers existed. Thank God I’m travelling to Nigeria where they
must have a black President and Nigerians take care of their own
affairs”!
On the night Ali fought Frazier, Frank Sinatra took pictures for Life
magazine at ringside. Ed Sullivan, Alan Shepard, Bill Cosby, Michael
Caine, Hubert Humphrey and Burt Bacharach were among the luminaries in
the crowd. Please google their names if you do not know them. 750
journalists got press credentials; 500 other journalists could not.
Frazier won the fight. Ali’s reaction: “If I was young, I’d have danced
for 15 rounds. Joe wouldn’t ever have caught me. But I was
three-and-a-half years out of shape. He punched hard; he pressured me
good. And laying on the ropes to save energy, I lost some rounds I
could have won. But it would be wrong to say I gave the fight to Joe. I
didn’t give it away. Joe earned it.”
Time magazine wrote: It was a kind of epiphany that those who watched
realized how much they missed him and how much he had contributed to
the world of sport. Students of boxing will pore over the trio of
Ali-Frazier fights, which rank among the greatest in fistic history, as
one might read three acts of a great drama. They would remember the
shenanigans, the Ali Shuffle, the Rope-a-Dope, the fact that Ali had
brought beauty and grace to the most uncompromising of sports. And they
would marvel that through the wonderful excesses of skill and
character, he had become the most famous athlete, indeed, the
best-known personage in the world.
New York Times columnist William Rhoden wrote, “Ali’s actions changed
my standard of what constituted an athlete’s greatness. Possessing a
killer jump shot or the ability to stop on a dime was no longer enough.
What are you doing for the liberation of your people? Muhammad Ali is
how we measure a hero”.
This why I quarrel with the nonsense the Nigerian media poured out
about Ali: yes, it was good to remember, as someone wrote “all of that
raw drama, the greatest story in sport, but we also remember Ali for
what he did not do, which was have a career during what should have
been his absolute prime. Ali had just turned 25 when he lost his boxing
licence. By the time he returned he was almost 29. He was never the same
again. To be the same as he was at 25 would have denied the laws of
nature. The most shocking thing about Ali’s career is that we missed
his golden years, when youth and experience would have coincided. He
was a different fighter before and after his suspension. He surrendered
the best years of his life for a moral principle”.
Those lost years are the true hallmark of his greatness - that he
would surrender millions of dollars and white America’s adulation and a
chance that would never come again for what he believed in.
Sports Illustrated wrote: “When Ali came back in 1970, and all those
epic fights with Frazier and Foreman were still before him, how did he
deal with the loss of youth? With guile. Experience. Cunning. And by
soaking up punishment in a way that he’d never had to during his
dancing years. In a man so lavishly blessed, Ali’s greatest asset of
all was his heart. “Perhaps his most vexed discovery in his second
career was that he could take a punch,” wrote David Remnick in King Of
The World: Muhammad Ali And The Rise Of An American Hero. “And he took
hundreds of them: from Frazier, Foreman, Ken Norton, Earnie Shavers,
Holmes, Leon Spinks; from a parade of second-rung heavyweights, from a
platoon of sparring partners who were instructed to bang away at Ali in
the gym, the better to toughen him up for the bouts themselves.
Learning to take a punch was a form of short-term survival for Ali - it
was the secret to the great triumphs in Zaire and the Philippines - but
it was a long-term disaster.”
Ali’s most distinguishing was his courage; that virtue of the heart. It
took courage to master Sonny Liston and become heavyweight champion of
the world aged 22. It took courage to change his name from Cassius Clay
to Muhammad Ali. It took courage to refuse to fight in Vietnam. It
took courage to fight for the Black cause. It took courage to lose his
golden years and it took courage to become world heavyweight champion
three times.





Post a Comment